Living in Fear Update
For the past several years now, New York conversations have often veered towards considerations of apocalyptic scenarios. Even before September 11, New Yorkers were a pessimistic breed. Then came the anthrax and the blackout and the London subway bombings, so now we’re essentially a city of eight million paranoid freaks. We’re all like the man muttering to himself about the FBI on the 6 train at three in the morning, we’re just better at hiding it.
Yesterday I had separate conversations, with friends Nick and Jon, about how many different things could happen that would send me immediately scurrying from NYC. Another major attack of a landmark might not do it, at least not for reasons of physical fear, but I mentioned that a subway bombing might do the trick, which led to this uniquely New York exchange:
Nick: Just one (subway bomb)?
Me: Probably.
Nick: What if it wasn’t on your line?
Me: I’m not sure that would make a difference. It might.
While we all remain wary of potential human enemies, though, it’s those pesky birds we need to look out for. I say that freedom must yield to caution during dangerous times, so I’m demanding that every third bird be searched before getting on mass transit systems. I know this will make me unpopular, but I’ll stand by it.
Last night, I pointed out to Jon that the 1918 influenza epidemic killed 14 billion people worldwide (I was exaggerating to get his attention), but he reassured me that any mega-killer flu, like the everyday variety, would mostly affect the old and infirm. But I read on the web today (and like most, I believe everything I read on the web) that: "The (1918) flu was most deadly for people ages 20 to 40. This pattern of morbidity was unusual for influenza which is usually a killer of the elderly and young children." Hmm. Never have I so wished to be elderly.
Yesterday I had separate conversations, with friends Nick and Jon, about how many different things could happen that would send me immediately scurrying from NYC. Another major attack of a landmark might not do it, at least not for reasons of physical fear, but I mentioned that a subway bombing might do the trick, which led to this uniquely New York exchange:
Nick: Just one (subway bomb)?
Me: Probably.
Nick: What if it wasn’t on your line?
Me: I’m not sure that would make a difference. It might.
While we all remain wary of potential human enemies, though, it’s those pesky birds we need to look out for. I say that freedom must yield to caution during dangerous times, so I’m demanding that every third bird be searched before getting on mass transit systems. I know this will make me unpopular, but I’ll stand by it.
Last night, I pointed out to Jon that the 1918 influenza epidemic killed 14 billion people worldwide (I was exaggerating to get his attention), but he reassured me that any mega-killer flu, like the everyday variety, would mostly affect the old and infirm. But I read on the web today (and like most, I believe everything I read on the web) that: "The (1918) flu was most deadly for people ages 20 to 40. This pattern of morbidity was unusual for influenza which is usually a killer of the elderly and young children." Hmm. Never have I so wished to be elderly.
Labels: NYC, Rational fear
7 Comments:
you're not exaggerating at all. this play i saw last night about the 1918 flu said 21 million died. and the times recently said it killed from 20-100 million, which seems like an awful big range to me. but only 700,000 from the States, which makes me feel a lot better.
What does it mean that in a blog the stated purpose of which is to fend off mortality we find such grave musings? One dark view (mine?) might be that you find death irresistible on some level. I offer you, Jim, the immortal (ha) words of BOC: Don't fear the reaper.
Living in fear sounds rather boring.
And it makes perfect sense that a blog claiming to fend off mortality would contain such sentiments. Death makes you skittish, eh? Well, if we ask for you tomorrow will we find you such a grave man?
Hmm. Um, please don't ask for me tomorrow, Anonymous. You sound creepy. The NY fear update was meant to be at least a bit tongue-in-cheek. Living in fear is indeed boring, as are many other forms of living. As for the blog's claim to fend off mortality, I'm not that dumb -- I take vitamins and sleep in a hyperbaric chamber to take care of that. (Always thinking.)
Well, what can one say. This whole being anonymous business is awfully enervating and, well, it's made me a bit of a crank. Wait -- does that mean I'm crazy or tired? It doesn't matter. What does matter is birds' rights. You ought to be more sensitive to those than anyone here, rtp.
A-ha, I think I see what this anonymous business is all about now. OK, anon., I'll see you tomorrow. We can discuss mortality and other fun subjects then.
Post a Comment
<< Home